企业培训资讯_企业培训干货

当前位置:首页 > 核心课程 > 常见问题

Control and Transparency the Key to Furthering Programmatic【亚博买球,亚博买球网址,亚博线上买球,亚博体彩买球,亚博买球官网】

发布时间:2022-08-20    来源:体彩官网15362

本文摘要:Programmatic technologies offer media buyers and advertisers a wonderful opportunity to improve campaign performance but for programmatic to be truly embedded, advertisers need control and transparency around their investment in programmatic. Programmatic spend in Asia Pacific is predicted to grow 35% each year, reaching about USD7 billion in 2019, with some markets such as Indonesia, Vietnam and Korea predicted to double in size each year until 2019¹. So why are decision makers in Asia Pacific moving to programmatic in such a big way? ‘Better contextual targeting’ is seen as the biggest benefit of programmatic buying – cited by just over half of this group as very important, followed by ‘faster execution’ (48%) and the ability to optimise in real-time (46%)². However, it is important not to get carried away. While marketers are keen to embrace the technology, there are key barriers to its wider adoption. Aside from time, the main reasons Asia Pacific decision makers have not used programmatic is its technical complexity (cited by 50%), not having an agency partner to help use it, or not having the skills in-house to do so (both around 40%).² The “Trade-Off” Heart of the Issue The pros and cons of programmatic highlighted above can be boiled down to a simple trade-off. Before programmatic, advertisers had more control over where ads were placed but wastage, and inefficiency, were high because – to put it simply – buying an ad on a site means you reach all users of the site rather than only those you want to reach. Programmatic has ushered in a new era of granular audience targeting to reduce wastage but with that comes a loss of control and transparency. In other words, as efficiency rises, control decreases. The good news is these are not in a “seesaw” relationship, if one goes up the other does not have to come down. The key to maximising both efficiency and control lies in the mechanisms you have in place before you ever get into bidding for an ad placement that might be served, so how can you address this? Control is about Brand Protection Although loss of control and transparency can be a worry for various reasons, it really boils down to advertisers’ concern about the potential damage to their brand if their ads are served in harmful contexts. However, having the right plumbing in place means these risks can be mitigated, even in programmatic. The first thing advertisers can do is be aware that brand safety is a far more nuanced issue than simply avoiding obvious environments such as pornography, violence, and illegal or terrorist websites. It is about avoiding topics or contexts that might be uniquely harmful to your brand, such as names of specific competitors or particularly damaging current events. For example, a peanut butter brand will not want ads around articles about nut allergies rising in young children, and cruise ship operators will not want ads around articles on boating accidents. Once you are aware of this, you need to make sure any ad delivery partners you are working with have highly customisable and powerful campaign protection tools in place. comScore clients, for example, can choose from three cinema-style ‘maturity’ ratings and 17 brand safety flag ‘filters’ before their ads even get to the bidding stage. It is also worth pointing out these tools should be used alongside those which maximise viewable environments and minimise exposure to non-human and fraudulent traffic. Context is King The nut allergy and boating accident articles are examples of removing contexts that can be harmful to a brand. Hence, once you are secured with brand safety, what you really want is to focus on the contexts that are going to drive the most success. The industry has paid too much attention on the former (ad validation) at the expense of the latter (ad relevance). The right programmatic tech has the ability to find quality content and audiences you can act on in real-time. Your partner must be able to execute this ‘contextual categorisation’ at the domain, site, page or page element level, which requires hundreds of thousands of dynamically updated topical categories. Take, for example, a sports brand that wants to create brand awareness around new long-distance running shoes. The secret sauce is about combining the best elements of contextual categories (great for finding general topical relevance such as ‘running’) and keyword targeting (great for exact word matches like ‘marathon’). The ‘running’ category is selected so the sports brand’s ad appears on a running interest site. However, the article is about gaining muscle, so not one to attract those training for a marathon. A custom keyword is selected to target inventory with the word ‘marathon’, but this brings up articles about a dog who accidentally ran one. Only by using BOTH the contextual and the keyword targets, you get a marathon-related article on a running interest site – exactly the type of relevant content you require. So remember, whilst validation makes sure your ad can be seen in the right environment, relevance is the most important factor for reaching a consumer who could be interested in your campaign – and your product.

亚博买球,亚博买球网址,亚博线上买球,亚博体彩买球,亚博买球官网

Programmatic technologies offer media buyers and advertisers a wonderful opportunity to improve campaign performance but for programmatic to be truly embedded, advertisers need control and transparency around their investment in programmatic. Programmatic spend in Asia Pacific is predicted to grow 35% each year, reaching about USD7 billion in 2019, with some markets such as Indonesia, Vietnam and Korea predicted to double in size each year until 2019¹. So why are decision makers in Asia Pacific moving to programmatic in such a big way? ‘Better contextual targeting’ is seen as the biggest benefit of programmatic buying – cited by just over half of this group as very important, followed by ‘faster execution’ (48%) and the ability to optimise in real-time (46%)². However, it is important not to get carried away. While marketers are keen to embrace the technology, there are key barriers to its wider adoption. Aside from time, the main reasons Asia Pacific decision makers have not used programmatic is its technical complexity (cited by 50%), not having an agency partner to help use it, or not having the skills in-house to do so (both around 40%).² The “Trade-Off” Heart of the Issue The pros and cons of programmatic highlighted above can be boiled down to a simple trade-off. Before prog

亚博买球,亚博买球网址,亚博线上买球,亚博体彩买球,亚博买球官网

rammatic, advertisers had more control over where ads were placed but wastage, and inefficiency, were high because – to put it simply – buying an ad on a site means you reach all users of the site rather than only those you want to reach. Programmatic has ushered in a new era of granular audience targeting to reduce wastage but with that comes a loss of control and transparency. In other words, as efficiency rises, control decreases. The good news is these are not in a “seesaw” relationship, if one goes up the other does not have to come down. The key to maximising both efficiency and control lies in the mechanisms you have in place before you ever get into bidding for an ad placement that might be served, so how can you address this? Control is about Brand Protection Although loss of control and transparency can be a worry for various reasons, it really boils down to advertisers’ concern about the potential damage to their brand if their ads are served in harmful contexts. However, having the right plumbing in place means these risks can be mitigated, even in programmatic. The first thing advertisers can do is be aware that brand safety is a far more nuanced issue than simply avoiding obvious environments such as pornography, violence, and illegal or terrorist websites. It i

亚博买球,亚博买球网址,亚博线上买球,亚博体彩买球,亚博买球官网

s about avoiding topics or contexts that might be uniquely harmful to your brand, such as names of specific competitors or particularly damaging current events. For example, a peanut butter brand will not want ads around articles about nut allergies rising in young children, and cruise ship operators will not want ads around articles on boating accidents. Once you are aware of this, you need to make sure any ad delivery partners you are working with have highly customisable and powerful campaign protection tools in place. comScore clients, for example, can choose from three cinema-style ‘maturity’ ratings and 17 brand safety flag ‘filters’ before their ads even get to the bidding stage. It is also worth pointing out these tools should be used alongside those which maximise viewable environments and minimise exposure to non-human and fraudulent traffic. Context is King The nut allergy and boating accident articles are examples of removing contexts that can be harmful to a brand. Hence, once you are secured with brand safety, what you really want is to focus on the contexts that are going to drive the most success. The industry has paid too much attention on the former (ad validation) at the expense of the latter (ad relevance). The right programmatic tech has the ability to find q

亚博买球,亚博买球网址,亚博线上买球,亚博体彩买球,亚博买球官网

uality content and audiences you can act on in real-time. Your partner must be able to execute this ‘contextual categorisation’ at the domain, site, page or page element level, which requires hundreds of thousands of dynamically updated topical categories. Take, for example, a sports brand that wants to create brand awareness around new long-distance running shoes. The secret sauce is about combining the best elements of contextual categories (great for finding general topical relevance such as ‘running’) and keyword targeting (great for exact word matches like ‘marathon’). The ‘running’ category is selected so the sports brand’s ad appears on a running interest site. However, the article is about gaining muscle, so not one to attract those training for a marathon. A custom keyword is selected to target inventory with the word ‘marathon’, but this brings up articles about a dog who accidentally ran one. Only by using BOTH the contextual and the keyword targets, you get a marathon-related article on a running interest site – exactly the type of relevant content you require. So remember, whilst validation makes sure your ad can be seen in the right environment, relevance is the most important factor for reaching a consumer who could be interested in your campaign – and your produc
本文关键词:亚博买球,亚博买球网址,亚博线上买球,亚博体彩买球,亚博买球官网

本文来源:亚博买球,亚博买球网址,亚博线上买球,亚博体彩买球,亚博买球官网-www.yourauto.cn

分享到:
相关推荐MORE+
10-02 浅谈城市规划的可持续发展策略

本文摘要:城市规划是人居环境的层面之上、以城市层次为主导工作对象的空间规划。城市规划是人居环境的层面之上、以城市层次为主导工作对象的空间规划。城市规划以及管理仍然是城市建设实践中之中面对的最重要的的难

10-02 亚博买球,亚博买球网址,亚博线上买球,亚博体彩买球,亚博买球官网:浅论会计政策选择及其影响

本文摘要:[论文关键词]政策 自由选择 影响   [论文概要]本文在有效地假说、现代科学和后果理论三项理论的基础上阐释了会计学政策自由选择对企业层、企业股东、企业债权人、政府和企业市场价值的影响。[论

10-02 我国循环经济发展存在的问题和对策:亚博买球,亚博买球网址,亚博线上买球,亚博体彩买球,亚博买球官网

本文摘要:我国循环经济发展不存在的问题和对策  ▲▲一、循环经济的内涵  所谓循环经济,是指按照生态规律运营、实施资源循环利用和清洁生产的经济形态。我国循环经济发展不存在的问题和对策  ▲▲一、循环经

10-02 天猫“双11”1207亿元交易额 保险行业提供224亿元保障

本文摘要:简介:在今年天猫“双11”全球狂欢节产生的1207亿元交易额背后,保险行业总计获取224亿元确保金额,总计6亿笔保单,平均值每分钟出有单41万件,参予其中的9家保险公司在蚂蚁金服保险平台上再

【亚博买球,亚博买球网址,亚博线上买球,亚博体彩买球,亚博买球官网】娱乐消费的黄金第四季度——AdTime 亚博买球,亚博买球网址,亚博线上买球,亚博体彩买球,亚博买球官网|
保山市工会社会事情人才招聘考试圆满竣事
热门文章
【亚博买球,亚博买球网址,亚博线上买球,亚博体彩买球,亚博买球官网】娱乐消费的黄金第四季度——AdTime
电商高热景象,将在未来一两年内消退-亚博买球,亚博买球网址,亚博线上买球,亚博体彩买球,亚博买球官网
亚博买球,亚博买球网址,亚博线上买球,亚博体彩买球,亚博买球官网-谷歌、新浪、品友互动作为三家最具代表互联网企业荣获工信部“中小企业首选服务商”
亚博买球,亚博买球网址,亚博线上买球,亚博体彩买球,亚博买球官网|福特福瑞斯赞助有养《耐撕爸妈》实力斩获中国广告长城奖
【亚博买球,亚博买球网址,亚博线上买球,亚博体彩买球,亚博买球官网】2秒就能抓人眼球的5种标题!
你的浏览器用的顺手吗?离别小网站广告骚扰 | 第一篇【亚博买球,亚博买球网址,亚博线上买球,亚博体彩买球,亚博买球官网】
亚博买球,亚博买球网址,亚博线上买球,亚博体彩买球,亚博买球官网_ 考驾照 一般需要花几多钱?
营销必备1:最新线上推广渠道汇总
段子:会说广告词的学生 会记大过!
【品牌资讯】2018爱奇艺母婴盛典引行业齐聚 共话育儿新视界
【亚博买球,亚博买球网址,亚博线上买球,亚博体彩买球,亚博买球官网】励尚公关在亚太区正式推出All Told业务
亚博买球,亚博买球网址,亚博线上买球,亚博体彩买球,亚博买球官网:国内第一家航运产业基金将落户上海
新手怎么设置广告投放收益:亚博买球,亚博买球网址,亚博线上买球,亚博体彩买球,亚博买球官网
【亚博买球,亚博买球网址,亚博线上买球,亚博体彩买球,亚博买球官网】 全棉时代回应广告涉嫌侮辱女性:视频为广告创意
映盛中国斩获第四届TopDigital·2016创新峰会四项大奖|亚博买球,亚博买球网址,亚博线上买球,亚博体彩买球,亚博买球官网
客户案例
×